考研英语二满分100分，难度一般在四六级之间，相对比较容易。往年的英语单科分数线是42分。但是想要总分达到国家线（去年为170），英语仅仅考到42分是不够的。以去年为例，众凯学生当中，95%是60分以上。所以英语想要得分还是需要一定的基础和特定的复习方法的。下面我就从题型方面给你一些切实有效的复习方法哦 英语二从2010年开始改革。题型也从2010年开始发生了变化。如果要买参考书，建议买近十年真题书。 完型（20空，每空0.5分，一共10分）2. 阅读（Part A，四篇文章，每篇五题一题2分，共40分；Part B,一篇7选5文章，每篇五题，一题2分，共10分）3. 翻译（英译汉，15分）4. 写作（Part A，应用文写作10分，Part B，议论文写作15分）首先英语基础为词汇量。必须达到大纲词汇5500左右。但是我不建议你用app或者单词书来背单词哦。可以适当使用语境记忆法和词根词缀联想记忆法。另外一些江湖记忆法，比如pregnant（扑来个男的）怀孕，ambulance（俺不能死）救护车，pest（拍死他）昆虫，ponderous（胖的要死）肥胖的。等等这样的谐音记忆法也是非常有效果的哦。而且这样记得多记得牢。并且词汇需要反复记忆直到考前一天都不要松懈。要根据艾宾浩斯记忆曲线有效回顾才能多快好省记单词哦~其次英语最重要的基础就是长难句了。因为长难句是英语二阅读必考点，也是重难点。一定记得把三大复合句搞懂。能看懂句子，分析出主干就可以了。这两点是完型的必备考点。然后是阅读。阅读一定要摸清楚考试套路。英语二的套路和四六级专四专八都不太一样。可以适当听听课。听完课再刷题效果会比较好。并且做完十一年英语二真题之后还可以做十一年英语一真题试试。英语一和英语二的大纲是一样的。所以考试套路也相似。可以辅助练习。再次是翻译。近几年英语二的翻译难度呈现下降趋势。难度大概在四级左右。翻译得分点是通顺。所以不要求翻译得特别优美。只需要通顺即可。真题多练习就可以了。最后是写作。英语二写作part A是应用文写作。占比10分，相对比较简单。就是写信件。十一年真题多写写。切记单词语法要正确，书写要整洁。写作part B是图表作文写作。占比15分。相对较难。词汇要求比较高。可以借助模板。但是不要完全照抄哦。分数会很低。希望我的回答可以帮到你。祝你考研顺利！
难度不是很大，但是肯定是要付出努力的。
难度不是很大，但是一定要努力学习
和去年比确实比较难
不算难。和往年差不太多

2014年考研英语二的难度要稍高于2013年，难度上升主要体现在阅读理解上面，今年的试题更加偏向于一些很细微的细节考核。 尽管整个英语二的难度比2013年要稍微难一点，但在主观题阅卷的时候，掌握的标准会稍微松一点，英语二的分数线跟去年相比基本会保持一致，应该不会有太大的变化。 英语知识运用 该部分不仅考查考生对不同语境中规范的语言要素（包括词汇、表达方式和结构）的掌握程度，而且还考查考生对语段特征（如连贯性和一致性等）的辨识能力等。共20小题，每小题0.5分，共10分。 在一篇240-280词的文章中留出20个空白，要求考生从每题给出的4个选项中选出最佳答案。
1、2014年考研英语二的难度要稍高于2013年，难度上升主要体现在阅读理解上面，今年的试题更加偏向于一些很细微的细节考核。 2、尽管整个英语二的难度比2013年要稍微难一点，但在主观题阅卷的时候，掌握的标准会稍微松一点，英语二的分数线跟去年相比基本会保持一致，应该不会有太大的变化。
细微的细节考核。 2、尽管整个英语二的难度比2013年要稍微难一点，但在主观题阅卷的时候，掌握的标准会稍微松一点，英语二的分数线跟去年相比基本会保持一致，应该不会有
难度必须高了，

2014考研英语一不难。 考研英语复习计划： 1、重点是考研词汇、基本语法，同时，阅读理解训练也要开始。语法等不会有什么变化，词汇每年大纲虽然有所修订，但变动不大，因此找本前一年的《大纲》先看着。有许多同学正好在这一阶段考CET6级，由于6级和考研难度大致相当，词汇量也差不多，所以可以结合起来复习。 2、词汇方面，应该在已经大体掌握意思的基础上，开始深入掌握用法，尤其是固定搭配和习惯用法。另一个重点是解决长难句，掌握各种句式。同时要加大阅读量，一方面提高阅读能力，另一方面也通过阅读来巩固语法、词汇和句式。本阶段必须进行相当量的题型专项练习，通过做题来巩固。 3、冲刺复习阶段的重要任务也有两个，一是进行大量模考练习，二是强化训练短文写作。对短文写作的强化，首先要对可能的命题范围作出预测。考研英语作文命题不会冷僻，不会很专业，通常都与学习生活紧密联系，或反映当前社会热点问题。例如保持健康、如何读书、环境保护、乱承诺等都曾是出题范围。了解到这些大概范围后，有意识地多阅读一些相关文章，熟悉有关观点、句式、词汇，多动笔写写，在考场上就可成竹在胸。
2014年的英语考试已经比去年较难，考研阅读特点之一是文章很难读懂，有些考生由于词汇量小，句子分析能力差，根本读不懂文章，所以也无法考到理想的分数。其次是选项迷惑性大，排除错误选项需要很多时间，而且不一定选对。作为考研英语试卷体系中发展最成熟、题型最稳定的部分，阅读主要考查的是考生理解文章结构、把握具体信息和解答不同类型题目的能力。
·······我是重点提示的分割线······· 1.关于备考前期是否使用单词书记单词的建议。保险起见，我们以六级为标准，过了的童鞋可以不用单词书，只从阅读训练中寻找生词查漏补缺的进行记忆，没过的童靴在3月和4月可以选择将足够的精力用于使用单词书背单词。 2.真题要掐时间做呀！不要一股脑儿十年的都做完呀！ 拉开时间，最近三年的题留在最后做！慢慢看自己的复习成果，很有成就感，有木有！真题很珍贵呀！ 3.考研英语考的是深度，广度在其次，这跟六级区别很大（譬如六级是考单词的主要常见意思，而考研英语考点常常是熟悉单词的次常见释义） for example~ 如果lz没记错的话，06年翻译真题考了个reason~reason~reason！ 4.另外可以选取真题中错的特别多的个别文章，认真笔译成中文！ 心译口译不可取，翻译这东西想到的跟写出来的往往大相径庭，你觉得你理解他的意思了要你翻译成通顺的中文其实还要做很多工作，写出来的过程很重要！ 这一点没有做过的人不会体会！！！ ·······重点提示什么的最重要了······ ~~~~~~~我是第一次添加时的分割线~~~~~~~ 1.大四上学期之前，童鞋们安心英语数学吧，不考数学的童鞋请无视。 2.英语真题绝壁是王道！求求你，信我吧！ 3.英语纯为了应试的话，搞阅读理解吧，搞吐了也要继续搞! (阅读理解里有你需要训练的一切，语法，单词，长难句分析，甚至作文) 4.你真的想在这一年的努力后考出个漂亮的英语成绩吗？ 请注意，我是说一年的努力后，那么背真题阅读理解原文吧！（好吧，我承认这是个笨办法，但是我保证有效，背三篇就会有成效，求求你，信我吧。） 5.单词认识就好，拼写是次要的！关键在于你认出它的速度，这是阅读速度的关键！ 6.背单词尤其是记它的意思，重点在于提高这个词的复现率！（所谓复现率，单词重复出现的频率是也~） ~~~~~~~~~~~~好吧，lz出杀手锏了~~~~~~~~~~~~ 给大家一个复习的具体方法吧！做阅读，有不会的词？继续读吧！读完了？做后面的题吧！ 做完了？对答案吧！错很多？你有两条路。 1.无视它！（如果是阅读理解练习题） 2.研究它！（如果是真题） 再读一遍吧！记得标出不认识的词哦~读第一遍不可以标哦~ 第二遍读完了？回去猜词儿玩儿吧~猜什么词儿？当时是刚标的啦~ 猜不出？查纸质词典去（牛津，韦氏神马的都行~文曲星神马的去死吧！） 查好了？整理出来哦，到专门的本子上！然后，嘿嘿~ ···重点来啦··· 把不会的词儿写在左手上，什么？你是左撇子！写右手吧！ 手的虎口位置比较好！ 不雅观吗？想想一年之后的研究生通知书吧！ ~~~~~~~~~2017-5-18更新一点儿单词记忆心得~~~~~~~~ 愚以为，词根记忆法，联想记忆法等等都是一个意思，就是要从动词可以得到名词可以得到形容词，可以得到副词，能够做到这样的真谛在于记住词根并且熟悉词缀（前缀，后缀，如豆瓣里常出现的ex，就是“前一个”意思的前缀，再如co前缀通常就是表示“共同”意思的前缀，再如in和dis前缀表示“非”，后缀如简单的er和or表示“者”，再如tion将词根变成相关名词，ly将词根变成相关副词或形容词，tism将词根变成相关名词“某主义者”不过词缀的意义也不完全相同，有些特殊的还是要特别对待~）再给一组典型的词根联想记忆的例子，conserve，conservation，conservatism，conservative，conservatory~ 记忆这组关键在于记忆单词或者说词根（conserve），然后通过后缀进行变化~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~更新完毕~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ···重点结束··· 解释：写手上，就是为了提高我刚刚说的单词的复现率！就是逼你去看，什么？写纸条儿上？你绝对不看第二眼，除非你要洗衣服了！单词搞好了？ 恭喜恭喜！最艰难的时刻已经过去鸟！ 接下来，又是两条路。 1.如果是阅读理解练习，这篇阅读理解可以pass了！ 2.如果是真题，研究题目去吧，细细思考！研究的劲头儿~ 给大家一个分析题目的方法吧，把这个选项为什么错写在每个选项的后面，真的要写出来，你想到和写出来是两种境界~ 只要你真的读懂了，大部分的错误你都可以察觉，没有吗？好吧，请精确的翻译每个选项！（请千万注意文中的修饰词，例如，表程度的副词，表状态的副词）好吧，我承认就算是你什么都做到位了还是会有很模棱两可的选项！ 就剩两个了，就是排除不掉了，有木有！ 恭喜你，你碰到了传说中的争议题。。。无视它吧！请保证这种题一套真题不超过两个！ 话说，争议题年年有啊，看看每年考后新东方，点点等机构的答案就知道啦，打得不可开交啊。。。讲课的老师们都搞不定，我们还是留着我们的脑细胞搞搞数学吧！题目也研究好了？每天早上起来反复读吧！只读真题哦！ 只读真题！真题！早读很重要哦~ 解释一下为什么要一直读，读到吐也不停歇~ read，read。read，unti you can recite it~这是背文章的不二法门~ 套用数学中极限的概念~我们这样做是在力图无限逼近背过所有真题文章的这个目标~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~呼···~~~好累···~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
我这里有14年英语一两篇阅读真题，你看看吧，或许对你有帮助 Text 1In order to “change lives for the better” and reduce “dependency”, George Osborne, Chancellor of the Exchequer, introduced the "upfront work search" scheme. Only if the jobless arrive at the job centre with a CV, register for the online job search, and start looking for work will they be eligible for benefit—and then they should report weekly rather than fortnightly. What could be more reasonable?More apparent reasonableness followed. There will now be a seven-day wait for the jobseeker’s allowance. “Those first few days should be spent looking for work, not looking to sign on.” he claimed, “We’re doing these things because we know they help people stay off benefits and help those on benefits get into work faster.” Help? Really? On first hearing, this was the socially concerned chancellor, trying to change lives for the better, complete with “reforms” to an obviously indulgent system that demands too little effort from the newly unemployed to find work, and subsidises laziness. What motivated him, we were to understand was his zeal for “fundamental fairness”—protecting the taxpayer, controlling spending and ensuring that only the most deserving claimants received their benefits.Losing a job is hurting: you don’t skip down to the job centre with a song in your heart, delighted at the prospect of doubling your income from the generous state. It is financially terrifying, psychologically embarrassing and you know that support is minimal and extraordinarily hard to get. You are now not wanted; you are now excluded from the work environment that offers purpose and structure in your life. Worse, the crucial income to feed yourself and your family and pay the bills has disappeared. Ask anyone newly unemployed what they want and the answer is always: a job.But in Osborneland, your first instinct is to fall into dependency—permanent dependency if you can get it—supported by a state only too ready to indulge your falsehood. It is as though 20 years of ever –tougher reforms of the job search and benefit administration system never happened. The principle of British welfare is no longer that you can insure yourself against the risk of unemployment and receive unconditional payments if the disaster happens. Even the very phrase “jobseeker’s allowance” is about redefining the unemployed as a “jobseeker” who had no fundamental right to benefit he or she has earned through making national insurance contributions. Instead, the claimant receives a time-limited “allowance”, conditional on actively seeking a job: no entitlement and no insurance, at £71.70 a week ,one of the least generous in the EU. 21. George Osborne’s scheme was intended to[A] provide the unemployed with easier access to benefits.[B] encourage jobseeker’ s active engagement in job seeking.[C] motivate the unemployed to report voluntarily.[D] guarantee jobseekers’ legitimate right to benefit.22. The phase “to sign on”(Line 3,Para.2)most probably means[A] to check on the availability of jobs at the job centre.[B] to accept the government’s restrictions on the government.[C] to register for an allowance from the government.[D] to attend a governmental job-training program.23. What prompted the chancellor to develop his scheme?[A] A desire to secure a better life for all.[B] An eagerness to protect the unemployed.[C] An urge to be generous to the claimants.[D] A passion to ensure fairness for taxpayers.24. According to Paragraph 3, being unemployed makes one feel[A] uneasy.[B] enraged.[C] insulted.[D] guilty.25. To which of the following would the author most probably agree?[A] The British welfare system indulges jobseekers’ laziness.[B] Osborne’s reform will reduce the risk of unemployment.[C] The jobseekers’ allowance has met their actual needs.[D] Unemployment benefits should not be made conditional.Text 2All around the world, lawyers generate more hostility than the members of any other profession—with the possible exception of journalism. But there are few places where clients have more grounds for complaint than America.During the decade before the economic crisis, spending on legal services in America grew twice as fast as inflation. The best lawyers made skyscrapers-full of money, tempting ever more students to pile into law schools. But most law graduates never get a big-firm job. Many of them instead become the kind of nuisance-lawsuit filer that makes the tort system a costly nightmare.There are many reasons for this. One is the excessive costs of a legal education. There is just one path for a lawyer in most American states; a four-year undergraduate degree in some unrelated subject, then a three-year law degree at one of 200 law schools authorized by the American Bar Association and an expensive preparation for the bar exam. This leaves today’s average law-school graduate with $100,000 of debt on top of undergraduate debts. Law-school debt means that they have to work fearsomely hard.Reforming the system would help both lawyers and their customers. Sensible ideas have been around for a long time, but the state-level bodies that govern the profession have been too conservative to implement them. One idea is to allow people to study law as an undergraduate degree. Another is to let students sit for the bar after only two years of law school. If the bar exam is truly a stern enough test for a would-be lawyer, those who can sit it earlier should be allowed to do so. Students who do need the extra training could cut their debt mountain by a third.The other reason why costs are so high is the restrictive guild-like ownership structure of the business. Except in the District of Columbia, non-lawyers may not own any share of a law firm. This keeps fees high and innovation slow. There is pressure for change from within the profession, but opponents of change among the regulators insist that keeping outsiders out of a law firm isolates lawyers from the pressure to make money rather than serve clients ethically.In fact, allowing non-lawyers to own shares in law firms would reduce costs and improve services to customers, by encouraging law firms to use technology and to employ professional managers to focus on improving firms’ efficiency. After all, other countries, such as Australia and Britain, have started liberalizing their legal professions. America should follow. 26. A lot of students take up law as their profession due to[A] the growing demand from clients[B] the increasing pressure of inflation[C] the prospect ofworking in big firms[D] the attraction of financial rewards27. Which of the following adds to the costs of legal education in most American states?[A] Higher tuition fees for undergraduate studies[B] Receiving training by professional associations[C] Admissions approval from the bar association[D] Pursuing a bachelors degree in another major28. Hindrance to the reform of the legal system originates from[A] the rigid bodies governing the profession[B] lawyers’ and clients’ strong resistance[C] the stern exam for would-be lawyers.[D] non-professionals’ sharp criticism29. The guild-like ownership structure is considered “restrictive” partly because[A] prevents lawyers from gaining due profits.[B] bans outsiders’ involvement in the profession.[C] aggravates the ethical situation in the trade.[D] keeps lawyers from holding law-firm shares.30. In the text, the author mainly discusses[A] the factors that help make a successful lawyer in America.[B] a problem in America’s legal profession and solutions to it.[C] the role undergraduate studies in America’s legal education. [D] flawed ownership of America’s law firms and its causes.
比较简单，词汇量比较小。

不难。 虽然2014年考研英语二难度上升主要体现在阅读理解上面，试题更加偏向于一些很细微的细节考核，但在主观题阅卷的时候，掌握的标准会稍微松一点，英语二的分数线相比基本会保持一致，应该不会有太大的变化。 考研英语考试内容试题分三部分，包括英语知识运用、阅读理解和写作。英语知识运用考查考生对不同语境中规范的语言要素（包括词汇、表达方式和结构）的掌握程度，而且还考查考生对语段特征（如连贯性和一致性等）的辨识能力等。 阅读理解该部分由A、B、C三节组成，考查考生理解书面英语的能力。A节考查考生理解主旨要义、具体信息、概念性含义；B节考查考生对诸如连贯性、一致性等语段特征以及文章结构的理解。C节主要考查考生准确理解概念或结构较复杂的英语文字材料的能力。

2014年的英语考试已经比去年较难，考研阅读特点之一是文章很难读懂，有些考生由于词汇量小，句子分析能力差，根本读不懂文章，所以也无法考到理想的分数。其次是选项迷惑性大，排除错误选项需要很多时间，而且不一定选对。作为考研英语试卷体系中发展最成熟、题型最稳定的部分，阅读主要考查的是考生理解文章结构、把握具体信息和解答不同类型题目的能力。
你好：考试难不难，是一个相对的概念，会者不难，不会不难，因人而异。去年我们考研初试结束后，都喊难，学校考研的一片惆怅，结果等2月6日初试成绩出来时，一个比一个考的好，倒是有一个现象值得注意，当时感觉考的好同学，反而成绩到低了，到愁了。考研结束后，无论感觉考的如何，都不要过于太刻意，淡定等到初试成绩的出来。凡是准备二战的，无论成绩是否出来，都要义无反顾的坚持去复习，尤其应届毕业考研感觉失利的同学，还想二战的同学更要如此。
难。。阅读特难。。要是去年我阅读至少32分。。今年也就是24分。。不容易入手。。别的还行。。
我觉得很难，哈哈，因为我一直英语很烂，阅读全是乱写 ，哎 今年考研无希望了，收拾东西寒假滚回家找工作去喽
我这里有14年英语一两篇阅读真题，你看看吧，或许对你有帮助 Text 1In order to “change lives for the better” and reduce “dependency”, George Osborne, Chancellor of the Exchequer, introduced the "upfront work search" scheme. Only if the jobless arrive at the job centre with a CV, register for the online job search, and start looking for work will they be eligible for benefit—and then they should report weekly rather than fortnightly. What could be more reasonable?More apparent reasonableness followed. There will now be a seven-day wait for the jobseeker’s allowance. “Those first few days should be spent looking for work, not looking to sign on.” he claimed, “We’re doing these things because we know they help people stay off benefits and help those on benefits get into work faster.” Help? Really? On first hearing, this was the socially concerned chancellor, trying to change lives for the better, complete with “reforms” to an obviously indulgent system that demands too little effort from the newly unemployed to find work, and subsidises laziness. What motivated him, we were to understand was his zeal for “fundamental fairness”—protecting the taxpayer, controlling spending and ensuring that only the most deserving claimants received their benefits.Losing a job is hurting: you don’t skip down to the job centre with a song in your heart, delighted at the prospect of doubling your income from the generous state. It is financially terrifying, psychologically embarrassing and you know that support is minimal and extraordinarily hard to get. You are now not wanted; you are now excluded from the work environment that offers purpose and structure in your life. Worse, the crucial income to feed yourself and your family and pay the bills has disappeared. Ask anyone newly unemployed what they want and the answer is always: a job.But in Osborneland, your first instinct is to fall into dependency—permanent dependency if you can get it—supported by a state only too ready to indulge your falsehood. It is as though 20 years of ever –tougher reforms of the job search and benefit administration system never happened. The principle of British welfare is no longer that you can insure yourself against the risk of unemployment and receive unconditional payments if the disaster happens. Even the very phrase “jobseeker’s allowance” is about redefining the unemployed as a “jobseeker” who had no fundamental right to benefit he or she has earned through making national insurance contributions. Instead, the claimant receives a time-limited “allowance”, conditional on actively seeking a job: no entitlement and no insurance, at £71.70 a week ,one of the least generous in the EU. 21. George Osborne’s scheme was intended to[A] provide the unemployed with easier access to benefits.[B] encourage jobseeker’ s active engagement in job seeking.[C] motivate the unemployed to report voluntarily.[D] guarantee jobseekers’ legitimate right to benefit.22. The phase “to sign on”(Line 3,Para.2)most probably means[A] to check on the availability of jobs at the job centre.[B] to accept the government’s restrictions on the government.[C] to register for an allowance from the government.[D] to attend a governmental job-training program.23. What prompted the chancellor to develop his scheme?[A] A desire to secure a better life for all.[B] An eagerness to protect the unemployed.[C] An urge to be generous to the claimants.[D] A passion to ensure fairness for taxpayers.24. According to Paragraph 3, being unemployed makes one feel[A] uneasy.[B] enraged.[C] insulted.[D] guilty.25. To which of the following would the author most probably agree?[A] The British welfare system indulges jobseekers’ laziness.[B] Osborne’s reform will reduce the risk of unemployment.[C] The jobseekers’ allowance has met their actual needs.[D] Unemployment benefits should not be made conditional.Text 2All around the world, lawyers generate more hostility than the members of any other profession—with the possible exception of journalism. But there are few places where clients have more grounds for complaint than America.During the decade before the economic crisis, spending on legal services in America grew twice as fast as inflation. The best lawyers made skyscrapers-full of money, tempting ever more students to pile into law schools. But most law graduates never get a big-firm job. Many of them instead become the kind of nuisance-lawsuit filer that makes the tort system a costly nightmare.There are many reasons for this. One is the excessive costs of a legal education. There is just one path for a lawyer in most American states; a four-year undergraduate degree in some unrelated subject, then a three-year law degree at one of 200 law schools authorized by the American Bar Association and an expensive preparation for the bar exam. This leaves today’s average law-school graduate with $100,000 of debt on top of undergraduate debts. Law-school debt means that they have to work fearsomely hard.Reforming the system would help both lawyers and their customers. Sensible ideas have been around for a long time, but the state-level bodies that govern the profession have been too conservative to implement them. One idea is to allow people to study law as an undergraduate degree. Another is to let students sit for the bar after only two years of law school. If the bar exam is truly a stern enough test for a would-be lawyer, those who can sit it earlier should be allowed to do so. Students who do need the extra training could cut their debt mountain by a third.The other reason why costs are so high is the restrictive guild-like ownership structure of the business. Except in the District of Columbia, non-lawyers may not own any share of a law firm. This keeps fees high and innovation slow. There is pressure for change from within the profession, but opponents of change among the regulators insist that keeping outsiders out of a law firm isolates lawyers from the pressure to make money rather than serve clients ethically.In fact, allowing non-lawyers to own shares in law firms would reduce costs and improve services to customers, by encouraging law firms to use technology and to employ professional managers to focus on improving firms’ efficiency. After all, other countries, such as Australia and Britain, have started liberalizing their legal professions. America should follow. 26. A lot of students take up law as their profession due to[A] the growing demand from clients[B] the increasing pressure of inflation[C] the prospect ofworking in big firms[D] the attraction of financial rewards27. Which of the following adds to the costs of legal education in most American states?[A] Higher tuition fees for undergraduate studies[B] Receiving training by professional associations[C] Admissions approval from the bar association[D] Pursuing a bachelors degree in another major28. Hindrance to the reform of the legal system originates from[A] the rigid bodies governing the profession[B] lawyers’ and clients’ strong resistance[C] the stern exam for would-be lawyers.[D] non-professionals’ sharp criticism29. The guild-like ownership structure is considered “restrictive” partly because[A] prevents lawyers from gaining due profits.[B] bans outsiders’ involvement in the profession.[C] aggravates the ethical situation in the trade.[D] keeps lawyers from holding law-firm shares.30. In the text, the author mainly discusses[A] the factors that help make a successful lawyer in America.[B] a problem in America’s legal profession and solutions to it.[C] the role undergraduate studies in America’s legal education. [D] flawed ownership of America’s law firms and its causes.